Astra Zenecas samarbete med Nobelstiftelsen ifrågasatt

Here is a letter that I had sent to the Nobel organization immediately after the award was presented: To the esteemed Ladies and Gentlemen of the Karolinska Institute, and members of the 2008 Nobel Prize Committee, I, and many thousands of others worldwide, in the name of Alfred Nobel, humbly ask that you reconsider the 2008 Nobel Prize award in physiology and medicine, revoking these prestigious awards to Barré-Sinoussi and Montagnier until purification of a retrovirus that causes AIDS is fully, unquestionably and independently established and verified with a high degree of probability. After 25 years of ever increasing public doubt, Alfred Nobel himself would demand nothing less than the highest due diligence in this matter. The reasons we find for revocation are many, but to be short and concise, I present to you the following facts: Professor Bjorn Vennstrom, who was on the Nobel nominating committee, immediately after the award was given to Luc Montagner et al, said in a radio interview that he hoped the award would silence those who claim HIV does not cause AIDS. He said: "We hope this will put an end to conspiracy theories and others who defend ideas that are not founded in research". Though we have difficulty understanding why a scientist would wish for anyone not to question any and everything, the only thing that will ever silence those who question HIV is not science by consensus or award, but credible science itself. Pr. Vennstrom's words are evidence of his bias and of political and emotional viewpoint on this matter, and are not founded in the presented scientific evidences. By the way, Vennstrom was also postdocing from 1980-1982 in San Francisco with Bishop and Varmus, who became oncogene Nobelists in 1989. But, there is as yet no evidence that "oncogenes" from human or animal cancers can transform normal cells to cancer cells. Yet, the question "why?" is no longer, "scientifically correct" since the Nobel Prize closed the case. Roma locuta causa finita. Now the Nobel committee has done just the same with HIV, which Varmus' committee, including Montagnier but NOT Gallo, named Human Immunodificiency Virus in 1986 without proof that this virus can cause immunodeficiency (Science, 1986). Another obvious bias on the Nobel committee, is Professor Jan Andersson, who was interviewed as the "spokesperson" for the committee selection of Luc Montagnier, immediately after the award to Montagnier was annouced. Professor Andersson is himself an HIV researcher with his own grants and "science" that is also highly threatened by those worldwide thousands who question HIV. Quite obviously, these two Nobel committee members were instrumental in urging the 2008 committee to give Luc Montagnier this award. And in so doing, the committee has not demonstrated unbiased or credible science as their measure in awarding the prize. It is crystal clear to many looking at this situation that bias, politics, and self interests are at stake. Furthermore, the award to Luc Montagnier for purifying (isolating) HIV is unconscionable, considering that in a 1993 interview, Montagnier himself said about HIV, and I quote: "I repeat, we did NOT purify". [www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/dtinterviewlm.htm] If perchance anyone ever does succeed in purifying isolated HIV from those said to be infected, it would at a minimum be required to have something more conclusive than Robert Gallo's presented "evidence" that HIV is the cause of AIDS, which evidence consisted of 36 out of 72 of his "AIDS patients" showing Reverse Transcriptase (RT) activity (Science 1984). RT activity is NOT restricted, as was believed by former scientists and retrovirologists, to be exclusive to retroviral activity. RT is also known to be caused by yeasts and can also be detected in other occasions as well. RT activity is also not any proof whatsoever of disease causation by any retrovirus. Furthermore, "evidence of RT activity as causation" was only found in a mere 40 percent of his AIDS patients. 40 percent is far removed from any high probability of disease causation. However, those worldwide thousands who DO question HIV as the cause of AIDS are indeed quite pleased that Gallo has been brushed from Nobel history. Be assured, that as soon as "we who question HIV" have credible independent science to back Montagnier and Gallo's claims, such as purified retrovirus taken directly from the blood sera of immunocompromised hiv positives, such as evidence of high probablity of disease causation by such a retrovirus, we will be glad to silence our own questioning selves, and we will be glad to join with the believers of the faith that HIV is the cause of AIDS. Until then, I, and many thousands of others, in the name of Alfred Nobel, again humbly ask that you reconsider the 2008 Nobel Prize award for physiology and medicine, and revoke this prestigious award until purification and proof of causation of a retrovirus that causes aids is fully and unquestionably independently established and verified. I remind you again that Alfred Nobel himself would demand of you nothing less than the highest due diligence in this matter. Unless you do so, the award itself becomes dishonored as a meaningless display of this generation's climate of unsupported scientific claims, based on bias, financial, and political motivations, consensus science, and popular belief instead of proven, verified, scientifically backed evidence. Sincerely, Michael Geiger, a homosexual American, on behalf of my fellow homosexual men worldwide who have been most impacted by this belief here in the west. And on behalf of the many many thousands of others worldwide who also do dare to question HIV as the cause of AIDS, based on the lack of supporting verifiable scientific facts. [www.rethinkingaids.com/quotes/rethinkers.htm]

Anmäl kommentar

Thank you so much for reporting on the conflict of interest of the Nobel Org. and Astra Zeneca regarding HPV. I want to alert you to the fact that Nobel Organization member and Professor Jan Andersson, who was instrumental in promoting the committee's choice to award the Prize in Medicine also to Luc Montagnier for HIV ALSO has two tremendous conflicts of interest in HIV. Both in HIV funding for his own research at a company he created known as AVARIS, and also: "From 1999 onwards Professor Andersson has been a scientific adviser for GlaxoSmithKline within the HIV-vaccine field". See the following link: http://www.karolinskafund.com/v2/eng/about_the_fund/scientific_advisory_board/jan_peter_andersson.asp One other thing I have found on 2008 Nobel Organization member Jan Andersson, besides being a fully paid member of Glaxo-Wellcome's HIV vaccine research, is that he started a company called AVARIS in 2001: Avaris Avaris is a Swedish biotech world-class company, sprung from cutting-edge research based on cell and gene therapy, at the Karolinska Institutet. Avaris develops therapies / vaccine against HIV and leukemia (The products AutoCell and CellProtect). The market for Avaris products is estimated to be worth 4.5 billion dollars per year. No wonder Andersson demanded that the discovery of HIV be hailed and saluted by the Nobel organization Would you have any contact information for anti-corruption chief Christer van der Kwast / DA with Riksenheten against corruption, or contact information for state district attorney Nils-Erik Schultz so that I may forward this information to them. You are all also more than welcome to inform them yourself, and I hope you will also report this further conflict of interest to the public, as I do not speak the language.

Anmäl kommentar

Det är väl inte förvånande att astrazeneca försöker marknadsföra sina patent o produkter med oschysta medel. Deras marknadsföring av andra preparat såsom nexium o crestor har ju inte varit speciellt snygg heller - så detta passar bra in i den något egendomliga etik som detta företaget numer har. Det skulle därför inte förvåna mig det minsta om det visar sig att man har lyckats påverka nobelkomiteen

Anmäl kommentar

Det vore verkligen illa för nobelpriset som helhet om det skulle visa sig vara någon form av otillbörlig påverkan. annars fixade ju Alfred Nobel det hela bra med en stiftelse som dels kunde förvalta pengarna, dels se till att dela ut priset på ett sätt som inte gärna kunnat ifrågasättas. Det är väl just därför priset anses så förnämligt att få. Förutom att han lyckades få en riktig kung att dela ut det också. Sådana vimlar det ju inte av i vår moderna värld. men utan all glansfull inramning vore priset kanske inte detsamma.

Anmäl kommentar